jonathan-cunningham:

girl-non-grata:

nom-chompsky:

jonathan-cunningham:

of-praxis:

akagoldfish:

nom-chompsky:

NGC’s Taboo is doing an episode on transablism.

In the promo for their new season, there’s a lady who is having surgery to become paraplegic, saying it will make her “feel like a complete person.”

From the NGC site:

Photo 1: Chloe Jennings-White leads a double life. A Ph.D chemist in Salt Lake City, Utah, Chloe lives as a paraplegic in a wheelchair. For the most part, people believe that Chloe is unable to walk, but she has a shocking secret. Chloe isn’t paraplegic at all.

Photo 2: Chloe Jennings-White stands beside her wheelchair. She is not a paraplegic, but chooses to live as one.

I love Taboo. It’s probably one of the smartest shows on the NGC. But this fucking blows. This is stupid Liberal moral relativism “all opinions are equally valid” at it’s most venal.

I mean, I could be wrong. Maybe they’ll do a really smart job of explaining why this shit is, and should be, taboo.

But I don’t have high hopes.

do you remember that episode of glee

where tina tells artie she doesnt really stutter

and artie says,

at the end of the day you can stop stuttering but i’ll be in this chair forever

fuck transabled ppl 4 real

cos even if they have BIID, there is no obligation for me to entertain what is quite literally psychosis as a legitimate set of social signifiers. like if she has BIID i get why she does this but that doesnt mean i have to support claims to  marginalization.

If BIID is real (I have no knowledge about the subject), I don’t understand how it would be different in this case from GID. I see no difference between you saying “there is no obligation for me to entertain what is quite literally psychosis as a legitimate set of social signifiers [sic]” when referring to BIID and GID.

gender is a social construct. legs are not.

Seriously, trying to justify the CHOICE of the transabled by pointing to the issue of sex and gender, which is a valid disparity due to biological variation and social adaptation, just ironically stinks of internalized cissexism.

Two things you mention here strike me: the first is the assumption that body dysphoria is more of a choice than gender dysphoria, without any defense of that assumption. The second is that biological variation and social adaptation applied to gender, but not to ability- this is simply factually false. The biological variation in ability is every bit as robust as it is in gender, and society drastically alters how people with disabilities are viewed and treated. 

I’m just going to throw my opinion in.  Being transgendered and transabled are similar in that both derive from a different view of the self than the body in which the person exists.  The difference is that a transabled person may (as is the case mentioned) strive to do something that removes functionality and is not necessarily in the overall best interest of the person.  For that reason alone I believe it should be handled with therapy as much as possible (although, to be fair, there is no evidence provided that the person above did not seek therapy).  What confuses me more than anything, though, is the amount of hatred and negativity on this post.  Maybe it’s just me, but you’d think those who are for transgender rights would be more sympathetic to someone experiencing a similar lack of contentment in their physical self and would want to see them helped as best as possible as opposed to bashing a mental plight that must already be hard enough to deal with.  Yes, it may be a choice to opt to go through with surgery to intentionally disable one’s self as opposed to living with a broken body image, but is it not also a choice to go through gender reassignment surgery or to undergo hormone therapy?  I don’t mean to make any of this seem like it isn’t as large as it is to an individual, and I have absolutely zero animosity towards anyone based solely on their differences from myself, but I think we all need to understand that everyone is different and we can’t purely know what goes on in anyone’s head but our own.  Live and let live, hope the best for those who are troubled, and strive to understand the plights of others as best as possible.

18

January

130 notes

This photo was reblogged from jonathan-cunningham and originally by nom-chompsky.

  1. smiles-n-kisses-xoxo reblogged this from 4-for-you-skywalker
  2. appletumbling reblogged this from pewpewlazerz and added:
    I have no problems with Otherkin (unless they’re appropriating the language and struggles of trans* people), but other...
  3. turnofftherain reblogged this from karnythia and added:
    Just want to point out that this woman, who states that she would ABSOFUCKINGLUTELY LOVE to be paraplegic, goes on 12...
  4. silverenvy09 reblogged this from burdened-with--glorious-purpose
  5. fuckdemolition reblogged this from jonathan-cunningham and added:
    I’m just going to throw my opinion in. Being transgendered and transabled are similar in that both derive from a...
  6. jonathan-cunningham reblogged this from girl-non-grata and added:
    Two things you mention here strike me: the first is the assumption that body dysphoria is more of a choice than gender...
  7. girl-non-grata reblogged this from nom-chompsky and added:
    Seriously, trying to justify the CHOICE of the transabled by pointing to the issue of sex and gender, which is a valid...
  8. dancing-with-diversity reblogged this from thisgingersnapsback
  9. dialling-footnoterphone reblogged this from maritsa-met and added:
    I had absolutely no idea what this was last night because I had it on mute but, I was very very confused when she went...
  10. windsdarkpoem reblogged this from jonathan-cunningham and added:
    it’s quite unpleasant even with hormones it’s a disconnect between the brain’s perception of the body and the reality of...
  11. maritsa-met reblogged this from nom-chompsky
  12. nom-chompsky reblogged this from jonathan-cunningham and added:
    gender is a social construct. legs are not.
  13. amorphousblob reblogged this from karnythia
  14. karnythia reblogged this from thegoddamazon
  15. unobservant reblogged this from thisgingersnapsback and added:
    I don’t normally comment on things like this but … Are you fucking kidding me?! Who would CHOSE to be disabled?! It’s...
  16. burdened-with--glorious-purpose reblogged this from yarndere
  17. yarndere reblogged this from konotherelationshipcounselor and added:
    Attention whore.
  18. konotherelationshipcounselor reblogged this from wintermoons and added:
    Baffled beyond words. Is there an interview that I can look for or something, because this isn’t making any sense to me...
  19. wintermoons reblogged this from sweetestel and added:
    The doctors shouldn’t even be considering doing this— this woman needs a psychiatrist, not a surgeon.
  20. sweetestel reblogged this from myidlehand and added:
    I’m not sure what scares me the most, here. The psychological mechanisms behind this person’s choice or the ethical...
  21. riseagainstme reblogged this from thisgingersnapsback and added:
    Wow. My best friends sister is quadrapalegic and it wasnt her fucking choice. You’re not a good person or proving...
  22. swellshark reblogged this from agradschoolbreakup
  23. roseannarchist reblogged this from thechocolatedandy and added:
    there are a couple of studies suggesting those three behaviors are the result of a specific malfunction in the affected...
  24. light-of-the-past reblogged this from thechocolatedandy and added:
    Not disabled/ethnic/special enough? There’s an app for that.
  25. sophie-fatale reblogged this from anticapitalist
  26. greenswimmingpool-pinkflamingos reblogged this from thisgingersnapsback
  27. shakai-shugi reblogged this from cosmopolitan-fascist